Monthly Giving is the Smart Answer

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

Quick Stats

Online giving only grew by 1% in 2018, according to recent data. Also true is that it grew 23% in 2017.

Also true is that while nonprofits sent four percent more fundraising emails last year, email revenue went down eight percent!

Sending more email is clearly NOT the answer; better quality content is.

Better quality includes shorter (90-second) emotional videos. However, that content should relate to your donor audience. (Why do I almost never see any videos of donors giving testimony about why they give?)

Monthly giving is clearly a solution to securing increased giving within your annual fund. One-time giving decreased by two percent.  But monthly giving increased by 17% and represents 16% of all online revenue.

What are your current stats for monthly giving? I ask because whatever they are, strive for doubling them. As people acclimate to making monthly payments for entertainment, food delivery, razors, podcast sponsorship, etc. the likelihood of increased monthly giving is high.

Monthly Donors are Retained Donors

Giving monthly is not an impulse purchase. It is instead a key indicator of a deep-seated commitment to your organization. The very definition of a donor is he or she who gives repeatedly and that requires commitment.

My mom gave to St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital all her life and while monthly giving didn’t exist as a concept back then, the hospital did mail to her each month. As she aged, she gave increased amounts. The structure of monthly giving reinforces one’s commitment to your organization and prevents them from lapsing.

This year’s data so far also shows a significant decline in retention among first-time donors, similar to the overall trend.  There was a 14% drop in first-time donor retention in 2018, which is worrying. Spending to retain your donors is a wise investment, and no better-routinized method exists than monthly giving to achieve that retention.

“Just Text It To Me”

Here at LAPA we have enforced monthly giving programs with SMS messages (plain text messages) because the click-through rates on these messages put email to shame. (Newer, more novel communication channels usually have this temporary advantage). The average text list is growing by 14%, but these lists are still small (about 6% of the size of email lists).

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »