Looking At The Biggest Picture

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

I’ll just say it right out, a nonprofit’s survival needs do not constitute a sound argument for raising money. To say that “We need money to survive” is a defensive statement. Instead, talk to your donors and funding partners about golden opportunities to make a difference. The fundamentals of fundraising apply now more than ever. An in-depth and emotional case must be made for your support. The best way to make that case is to focus on the fundamental impact your organization is having on the community it serves.

“Impact” will be the buzz word of the nonprofit sector for the next 20 years, just as “outcome” has been the buzz word for the past 20 years. People often confuse “impact” with “outcomes” or “quality assurance,” but these terms are not synonymous. An outcome is an indicator of services provided, for example having distributed 1,000 meals or 1,000 coats to people who are homeless. Quality assurance is a measure of client satisfaction; it means that the recipients of the foregoing services felt that their needs were met in a timely, effective, and respectful manner.

Impact is a big picture term. It refers to the social problem(s) the nonprofit was created to address and its efficacy in solving that social problem. Impact is looking at the biggest picture. In the above example, the impact of the agency would be its success in reducing homelessness. An impact assessment might be as follows: “Prior to the inception of our agency 1,500 people were homeless in our catchment area. Now only 900 people are homeless.” Due to circumstances beyond the nonprofit’s control, the social problem may in some cases have been aggravated. A proper impact statement should note these circumstances: “Because of the economic downtown, the number of people who are homeless in our area has increased to 2,000.”

Assessing the long-term impact of an organization is a vital function of the Board of Directors. “Are we solving the problem we set out to solve?” Unfortunately, many Boards and agencies get bogged down in the short term business and lose sight of the big picture. As a result, impact is not generally noted in the proposals, annual reports, and case statements of the nonprofit sector.

Emphasizing impact will always enable you to raise more money. The reason is that potential donors and funding partners will inevitably be impressed by an organization that can demonstrate it is solving a social problem, or at least moving the problem to a better level.

For practical suggestions on increasing impact, I recommend Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits, a book by Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant.

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »