Dueling Trends: Grants are Increasing, but Grant Seekers are Increasingly Unhappy

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

Some interesting findings have been reported by the Foundation Center and Independent Sector this year.

First, the Foundation Center.

For the sixth straight year, FC reports, community foundations show growth in assets, registering an average 11% increase in 2014 over 2013 assets levels.

Gifts to community foundations grew by 16% in 2014; community foundations increased their grants by an average of 17%.

New York State ranks first in the nation on number of foundations (9,880) and overall giving  ($8.7 billion).

Overall giving by the nation’s private and community foundations reached $54.7 billion in 2013,  surpassing previous record levels even after adjusting for inflation.

Overall foundation giving continued to grow a few points ahead of inflation in 2014. Independent and family foundations showed an ever higher rate of growth.

Sounds good, right?

Meanwhile, Independent Sector issued a report in October 2015 entitled Threads: Insights from the Charitable Community, based on coast-to-coast conversations with development professionals. “It’s clear,” states IS, “that there was tension between grant makers and grant seekers.” Here are some specifics:

Nonprofits report that the process of securing funds wastes time, too often devalues the expertise of organizations, and requires grantees acquiesce to foundation demands.

In addition, there is frustration when foundations “force nonprofits to engage,” in the words of one participant, in unproductive exercises to measure outcomes that the funders deem important even when the nonprofit believes that measurement of its impact should be differently focused.

Funders’ obsession with logic models and evaluation has forced nonprofits to produce creative fiction.

Participants mentioned the need to overcome communication barriers at multiple levels: between nonprofits and community stakeholders; between grant makers and grant seekers; and between sector organizations and both business and government.

Communication must be authentic…Create space for candor from all players and invite stakeholders from different perspectives to test assumptions.

The unavoidable conclusion: prospects are high for increased giving, but there are rumblings in the nonprofit hills! Stay tuned!

What trends have you observed in the past year?

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »
Fundraiser Retention

How To Improve Fundraiser Retention

That disturbingly high turnover rates and low morale plague fundraising professionals is nothing new. Research going back almost two decades shows this to be true.

One study in particular found that the “average fundraiser stays on a job only 16 months.”

In fact, just last year, author Rob Webb called on us to act on fundraising turnover right here in NonProfit Pro.

The past research on turnover was best summarized by our colleague Penelope Burke as follows:

Read More »