SAMHSA Funds Your Competitors

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

SAMHSA is the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. As a Federal Agency, SAMHSA increases awareness and understanding of mental health and substance use disorders by providing resources for treatment options, publishing peer reviewed materials on mental health and substance abuse recovery, and awarding grants. Consider what SAMHSA is doing for your competitors:

SAMHSA is funding your competitors.

While SAMHSA certainly funds some of the larger, more established organizations, like The Acacia Network and New York University School of Medicine, they also fund mid-size and smaller nonprofits like Baily House and FACES. In fact SAMHSA funded over 60 New York City nonprofits in 2015.

SAMHSA is funding your competitors at significant amounts.

This past year SAMHSA awarded over $345 Million to organizations in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey. At FACES, an organization with a $3.5 Million annual budget, SAMHSA awarded $500,000 for each of five years to increase access to HIV/AIDS treatment in underserved areas through the Targeted Capacity Expansion Initiative.

SAMHSA is building your competitors capacity to serve.

SAMHSA requires evaluation, so your competitors build that cost into their proposal’s budget. Not only does this make their proposal very competitive, but it’s a smart move in building their organizational capacity. The stronger the evaluation measurements, the more competitive your organization will be. LAPA includes a program evaluator in each SAMHSA proposal who, once you’re funded, would be a part of your team.

Do you want SAMHSA to support your organization, like they are supporting your competitors? Let me know what your funding priorities are, and I’ll see if your needs match up with SAMHSA’s funding priorities for 2016. At LAPA, our government grants services include a no fee retainer, and a $27:1 ROI. 

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »
Fundraiser Retention

How To Improve Fundraiser Retention

That disturbingly high turnover rates and low morale plague fundraising professionals is nothing new. Research going back almost two decades shows this to be true.

One study in particular found that the “average fundraiser stays on a job only 16 months.”

In fact, just last year, author Rob Webb called on us to act on fundraising turnover right here in NonProfit Pro.

The past research on turnover was best summarized by our colleague Penelope Burke as follows:

Read More »

The Secret to Why Donors Give

There are many reasons we in the fundraising industry tell one another about why donors give.  They are moved by your mission, they know a board or staff member, they’ve given for years, to name a few.  I doubt that all of them are true, and I especially doubt that they are all true at the same point in the giving calculus for each donor.

Read More »