SAMHSA Funds Your Competitors

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

SAMHSA is the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. As a Federal Agency, SAMHSA increases awareness and understanding of mental health and substance use disorders by providing resources for treatment options, publishing peer reviewed materials on mental health and substance abuse recovery, and awarding grants. Consider what SAMHSA is doing for your competitors:

SAMHSA is funding your competitors.

While SAMHSA certainly funds some of the larger, more established organizations, like The Acacia Network and New York University School of Medicine, they also fund mid-size and smaller nonprofits like Baily House and FACES. In fact SAMHSA funded over 60 New York City nonprofits in 2015.

SAMHSA is funding your competitors at significant amounts.

This past year SAMHSA awarded over $345 Million to organizations in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey. At FACES, an organization with a $3.5 Million annual budget, SAMHSA awarded $500,000 for each of five years to increase access to HIV/AIDS treatment in underserved areas through the Targeted Capacity Expansion Initiative.

SAMHSA is building your competitors capacity to serve.

SAMHSA requires evaluation, so your competitors build that cost into their proposal’s budget. Not only does this make their proposal very competitive, but it’s a smart move in building their organizational capacity. The stronger the evaluation measurements, the more competitive your organization will be. LAPA includes a program evaluator in each SAMHSA proposal who, once you’re funded, would be a part of your team.

Do you want SAMHSA to support your organization, like they are supporting your competitors? Let me know what your funding priorities are, and I’ll see if your needs match up with SAMHSA’s funding priorities for 2016. At LAPA, our government grants services include a no fee retainer, and a $27:1 ROI. 

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »