Keeping Grants Competitive

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

Grants are so highly competitive that a success average of one out of five submissions (20%) is quite acceptable. By contrast, a batting average of .200 in baseball will get you demoted to the minors or released.

We recommend that grant writers follow this checklist to make sure their applications and proposals remain competitive:

  1. Are your attachments up-to-date? Be sure the financial statements (independent audit and/or IRS Form 990) you’re submitting are the most recently available ones. Verify the Board of Directors list; members may come and go each year. Does your list of key staff members reflect the latest hires? Are your organizational and program budgets current, and do they square with the numbers in the audit and Form 990? Are you still including in your information packet press clippings that by now are way out-of-date?
  2. Strict compliance with the funder’s requirements. If the funder wants two hard copies of the proposal, or a signed statement that the Board has authorized the submission, or has stipulated that the pages of the submission should not be stapled, or that all components of the application should be submitted via e-mail on one pdf, have you noted and complied with these requirements?
  3. Save copies of all submissions in a convenient electronic file so that you can retrieve one in seconds for future reference should the funder call.
  4. When you receive a grant, don’t toss away the award letter. The award letter, not the proposal or application, is the legal document specifying how the funds are to be used. Consequently, the award letters are what your organization’s auditor needs to examine.
  5. Online applications require a checklist all their own:
    1. Start early so that you can complete one section at a time over several days rather than having to tackle the whole application at the last minute.
    2. Keep a library of previous online applications to more easily match your answers to the space constraints of the next one (500 words; 2,000 characters, etc.)
    3. At the initial sitting, first complete just a couple of boxes and make sure you can log out and log back in with ease, and that your answers are being saved.
    4. Online application portals may require passwords of different length and combinations of letters, numbers, and symbols. Keep track of which password you used for each separate funder.

This checklist will help make grants management manageable!

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »