Looking At The Biggest Picture

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

I’ll just say it right out, a nonprofit’s survival needs do not constitute a sound argument for raising money. To say that “We need money to survive” is a defensive statement. Instead, talk to your donors and funding partners about golden opportunities to make a difference. The fundamentals of fundraising apply now more than ever. An in-depth and emotional case must be made for your support. The best way to make that case is to focus on the fundamental impact your organization is having on the community it serves.

“Impact” will be the buzz word of the nonprofit sector for the next 20 years, just as “outcome” has been the buzz word for the past 20 years. People often confuse “impact” with “outcomes” or “quality assurance,” but these terms are not synonymous. An outcome is an indicator of services provided, for example having distributed 1,000 meals or 1,000 coats to people who are homeless. Quality assurance is a measure of client satisfaction; it means that the recipients of the foregoing services felt that their needs were met in a timely, effective, and respectful manner.

Impact is a big picture term. It refers to the social problem(s) the nonprofit was created to address and its efficacy in solving that social problem. Impact is looking at the biggest picture. In the above example, the impact of the agency would be its success in reducing homelessness. An impact assessment might be as follows: “Prior to the inception of our agency 1,500 people were homeless in our catchment area. Now only 900 people are homeless.” Due to circumstances beyond the nonprofit’s control, the social problem may in some cases have been aggravated. A proper impact statement should note these circumstances: “Because of the economic downtown, the number of people who are homeless in our area has increased to 2,000.”

Assessing the long-term impact of an organization is a vital function of the Board of Directors. “Are we solving the problem we set out to solve?” Unfortunately, many Boards and agencies get bogged down in the short term business and lose sight of the big picture. As a result, impact is not generally noted in the proposals, annual reports, and case statements of the nonprofit sector.

Emphasizing impact will always enable you to raise more money. The reason is that potential donors and funding partners will inevitably be impressed by an organization that can demonstrate it is solving a social problem, or at least moving the problem to a better level.

For practical suggestions on increasing impact, I recommend Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits, a book by Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant.

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »
Fundraiser Retention

How To Improve Fundraiser Retention

That disturbingly high turnover rates and low morale plague fundraising professionals is nothing new. Research going back almost two decades shows this to be true.

One study in particular found that the “average fundraiser stays on a job only 16 months.”

In fact, just last year, author Rob Webb called on us to act on fundraising turnover right here in NonProfit Pro.

The past research on turnover was best summarized by our colleague Penelope Burke as follows:

Read More »