Relationships, Relationships, Relationships

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

Never underestimate the human element in your wealth screening.

All the prospect research in the world doesn’t outweigh the need to include the human element in your wealth screen. Fundraising is a relationship business. Getting to meet your donors to learn about them is crucial for cultivation and solicitation, and yet securing meetings is often harder than securing gifts!

We often don’t know where to begin in securing a meeting. We ask other donors or our trustees, and they too are puzzled. Many stakeholders don’t have a direct connection to the donor. Instead, it’s often the case that your stakeholder knows someone indirectly— “six degrees of separation.” Thankfully, the field of “relationship science” and the attendant software (RelSci) has found a central place in wealth-screening.

RelSci software allows you to compare a list of your stakeholders (board members, donors, corporate leadership) against your list of donor prospects, and map the relationship between the two groups. For instance, a RelSci map will let you know that Sarah (your board member) knows Michael (Sarah’s work colleague) who knows Laurence (your major donor prospect). It’s often quite useful.

Specifically, RelSci software allows you to:

  • Determine the best connections between your stakeholders and the donor(s) you are attempting to cultivate, providing a roadmap to the all-important major donor prospects.
  • Identify new donor and or/leadership prospects. In the example above, it’s the board member’s colleague (Michael) who knows the major donor prospect (Laurence). In leveraging Michael to reach Laurence, it’s likely that Michael might develop an interest in the project and have the capacity to give. After all, peer-to-peer fundraising is one of the most successful segments of U.S. philanthropy today.
  • RelSci technology also does more than just identify major donor relationships. If you’re working with a set of new private foundation prospects (some of which may be “do not apply”), RelSci can help you get your foot in the door. The same can be said of prospective board members or corporate donor prospects you may have your eye on.

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »