Relationships, Relationships, Relationships

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

Never underestimate the human element in your wealth screening.

All the prospect research in the world doesn’t outweigh the need to include the human element in your wealth screen. Fundraising is a relationship business. Getting to meet your donors to learn about them is crucial for cultivation and solicitation, and yet securing meetings is often harder than securing gifts!

We often don’t know where to begin in securing a meeting. We ask other donors or our trustees, and they too are puzzled. Many stakeholders don’t have a direct connection to the donor. Instead, it’s often the case that your stakeholder knows someone indirectly— “six degrees of separation.” Thankfully, the field of “relationship science” and the attendant software (RelSci) has found a central place in wealth-screening.

RelSci software allows you to compare a list of your stakeholders (board members, donors, corporate leadership) against your list of donor prospects, and map the relationship between the two groups. For instance, a RelSci map will let you know that Sarah (your board member) knows Michael (Sarah’s work colleague) who knows Laurence (your major donor prospect). It’s often quite useful.

Specifically, RelSci software allows you to:

  • Determine the best connections between your stakeholders and the donor(s) you are attempting to cultivate, providing a roadmap to the all-important major donor prospects.
  • Identify new donor and or/leadership prospects. In the example above, it’s the board member’s colleague (Michael) who knows the major donor prospect (Laurence). In leveraging Michael to reach Laurence, it’s likely that Michael might develop an interest in the project and have the capacity to give. After all, peer-to-peer fundraising is one of the most successful segments of U.S. philanthropy today.
  • RelSci technology also does more than just identify major donor relationships. If you’re working with a set of new private foundation prospects (some of which may be “do not apply”), RelSci can help you get your foot in the door. The same can be said of prospective board members or corporate donor prospects you may have your eye on.

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »
Fundraiser Retention

How To Improve Fundraiser Retention

That disturbingly high turnover rates and low morale plague fundraising professionals is nothing new. Research going back almost two decades shows this to be true.

One study in particular found that the “average fundraiser stays on a job only 16 months.”

In fact, just last year, author Rob Webb called on us to act on fundraising turnover right here in NonProfit Pro.

The past research on turnover was best summarized by our colleague Penelope Burke as follows:

Read More »

The Secret to Why Donors Give

There are many reasons we in the fundraising industry tell one another about why donors give.  They are moved by your mission, they know a board or staff member, they’ve given for years, to name a few.  I doubt that all of them are true, and I especially doubt that they are all true at the same point in the giving calculus for each donor.

Read More »