Hot 2018 Trend Tip: Boost Major Gift Solicitation of Older Donors Now

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

Overwhelming 2018 data indicates significant charitable giving increases in giving by high-income donors (incomes over $1 million annually), but an overall decline in giving for lower-income individuals because of the new tax laws.

The increase in donor-advised funds also supports the data.

Adding to this data, the 90/10 rule (90% of the dollars will come from 10% of the donors) applies. It tells you that you should be spending 90% of your time working with the top 10% of the donors, not the other 90% who will only provide 10% of the donations. This was formerly known as the 80/20 rule; however, after the 1988 recession, and with the income gap raging out of control, I have found that 95% of the money comes from 2-3% of the donors. Regardless of the precise figures, which will vary among organizations, there are always a small number of donors providing most of the financial support, and they are almost always older.

I urge you to consider the impact this information will have on how your year-end solicitation strategy and overall development approach. I wrote about how to conduct these meetings a few weeks back in my post about in-person meetings.

Such a meeting can also boost your planned giving, which is an imperative. Why? Because donors aged 65 and older comprise (by far) the largest slice of the American charity pie. This is especially true because those age 70.5 and older with an IRA can now donate their required minimum distribution to your nonprofit.

Those under age 35 comprise the smallest slice of the same charity pie.

As master fundraiser Tom Ahearn notes, the typical donor is age 75. Tom goes on to note that the young will likely always be the smallest slice of the charity pie in the US, for obvious economic reasons.

We’ve always known that as people age they give away more to nonprofits.

 

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »