Can a USA Family Foundation Make Grants Outside the U.S.?

We at LAPA Fundraising are often asked, “Can we (a USA Family Foundation) make grants outside the U.S.? Family foundations can safely grant to non-501(c)(3) organizations outside the U.S. as long as they follow one of two special sets of procedures: expenditure responsibility or equivalency determination.

Expenditure Responsibility

The five basic steps for completing expenditure responsibility are not that different from the standard grantmaking procedures used by many foundations. Those five requirements are as follows:

  1. The foundation must make a reasonable investigation of the grantee to assure that they are capable of performing the charitable activity that is to be funded.
  2. The grantee must sign a written agreement with the foundation that describes what charitable activities are to be accomplished with the funds. In most circumstances, general purpose grants are not permitted. The agreement must also contain certain limitations (such as prohibiting the use of any of the funds for lobbying).
  3. Unless the grantee is another private foundation, the grantee must establish a separate account for the funds. Charitable dollars cannot be commingled with noncharitable dollars.
  4. The grantee must provide regular status reports on the expenditure of the funds and the progress made in fulfilling the charitable purpose for which the funds are earmarked.
  5. When filing the IRS Form 990-PF tax return for any year in which a payment for an expenditure responsibility grant is made, the foundation must indicate that expenditure responsibility payments were made and must add a schedule to the form with a brief description of each grant indicating the grantee, the amount, the charitable purpose and the current status of the grant.

Equivalency Determination

“Equivalency Determination” is a good faith judgment that the non-U.S. grantee is “the equivalent” of a U.S. public charity. The foundation may make such a determination based on either an affidavit of the grantee organization or an opinion of counsel (of the grantor or the grantee) that the grantee is a public charity. The affidavit or opinion must be based on sufficient facts and supported by adequate documentation.

What kind of documentation is sufficient? The file should be thorough enough so that the IRS will be satisfied that the determination was reasonable. Whether the foundation uses legal counsel or seeks to obtain an affidavit from the grantee, it is likely to need the same information:

  1. Organizational Documents such as articles of incorporation, charter, certificate of incorporation, or similar names. Bylaws (the organization’s internal governing rules) should also be obtained.
  2. Purposes and Activities. A detailed description of the purpose and activities of the grantee.
  3. Distribution of Assets. A copy of relevant statutory law, or provisions in the governing instrument, stating how the assets of the grantee will be distributed if it ceases to exist.
  4. Limitations. The grantee must also demonstrate that: 1) none of its assets or income will provide a private benefit to individuals; 2) its non-charitable activities or legislative lobbying are, and will be insubstantial; and 3) it will not participate in any political campaign or election on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office.
  5. Financial Data. Detailed financial data for several years for organizations that are not religious, educational, or medical institutions.

Most foundations active in international funding have traditionally preferred the use of lawyer equivalency letters; however, there’s a more affordable path. Under the IRS Revenue Procedure 92-94,  the IRS made it clear that multiple foundations may rely on the same affidavit. Because the affidavit format does not require incurring legal fees for each grantee, this change permits more small and medium sized foundations to make grants outside the United States.

May we help you think through your USA foundation’s international grant making? If so, please contact us to set a free 30-minute consultation.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Site Visits in the Zoom Age

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA & Sheldon Bart  In what we might call the BC era (Before COVID), site visits mainly entailed a tour of your nonprofit’s facility. You took the foundation program officer or the major donor on a walk around the program site to give them a good look at your day-to-day operations. They were happy to see in action the services described in words in your proposal or application. The tour consumed most of the time available for the visit, with a few minutes left over for questions. Now, after the disease disrupted our routines (or AD),

Read More »

Kick Off Your Year-End Fundraising Drive With a Thank You

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA Your year-end drive likely features written and email appeals delivered between Thanksgiving and the end of the year. That’s good … but … Before you make your appeals, you have an important opportunity to say “thank you” — and to do so in a way that is fresh and vibrant. Thanksgiving offers you a perfect hook for kicking off your year-end drive through a Thank-A-Thon — a “Thanks Bonanza” that you can start preparing for now. I cannot emphasize enough the importance of thanking donors and doing so in ways that do not come attached

Read More »

Giving Tuesday vs. Donor Advised Funds

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA As Giving Tuesday comes around on November 30, I am asking you to think deeply before you commit to promoting it. My annual struggle over whether to include Giving Tuesday (GT) in my year-end fundraising plan is in full swing. This year, I am distracted by the gargantuan untapped revenue that you can access from those donors with Donor Advised Funds (DAFs) — upwards of $140 billion. I am asking myself if instead of focusing on Giving Tuesday, would it be more lucrative for me to focus on cultivating and soliciting those donors with Donor Advised Funds? Your

Read More »

Beyond Major Gifts: Transformational Donors

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA To quickly understand the difference between a major donor and a transformational donor, here are three examples of very different donors, all of whom at one time were LAPA clients: first, a mega wealthy donor; second, a thoughtful philanthropist who made good use of his family fortune; and third, a widow who leveraged her own gift and invited her family and friends to join her. Michael Bloomberg gave a historic $1.8 billion gift to Johns Hopkins University (JHU) entirely for financial aid, allowing JHU to begin accepting students without regard to their ability to pay.

Read More »