The Fundraiser’s Role in Eradicating Poverty—No Matter Your Mission.

On Wednesday, LAPA hosted a panel discussion in remembrance of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. His legacy is often simplified to anti-racism work, but his work was unmistakably intersectional and considered poverty an equally devastating societal ill.

In reflecting on King’s legacy, we embrace a need to connect our own work to the eradication of poverty. Whether you’re a drug treatment program or an animal shelter, a dance studio or literacy program: we all have a part to play, no matter your mission.

Economic Justice for those who use your nonprofit is an imperative because when people’s incomes rise, poverty reduces. Social services and rental assistance are important, but they are steppingstones toward the real goal of raising income, raising the minimum wage, having a basic living wage, and reducing and eliminating student debt.

Amidst a global pandemic, the US gained 56 new billionaires, bringing the total to 659. Yet, during this same time, Covid-19 took the lives of black people at twice the rate of white Americans. 401,000 people are dead from the virus, the deaths disproportionate along lines of both class and race. Economic analysts at Moody’s project a wave of evictions between 760,000 and 4 million nationwide.

How do we fundraisers respond? What is required of us to fight poverty at this time?

As we contextualize our own fundraising work through the lens of poverty eradication, I think of the 3.5% rule. Do you know it? We all have a real temptation to think reducing poverty is insurmountable. The research by Erica Chenoweth reminds us it is not.

The Good News: the 3.5% Rule

Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist at Harvard University, looked at hundreds of social change campaigns over the last century and found that nonviolent campaigns are twice as likely to achieve their goals as violent campaigns. And although the exact dynamics will depend on many factors, she has shown it takes around 3.5% of the population actively participating in a campaign to ensure serious political change.

Chenoweth points out that while 3.5% is a small minority, such a level of active participation probably means many more people tacitly agree with the cause.

Methodology & Findings

Chenoweth performed an extensive review of the literature on civil resistance and social movements from 1900 to 2006 – a data set then corroborated with other experts in the field. By the end of this process, they had collected data from 323 violent and nonviolent campaigns. And their results – which were published in Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict – were striking. Overall, nonviolent campaigns were twice as likely to succeed as violent campaigns: they led to political change 53% of the time compared to 26% for the violent protests. “There weren’t any campaigns that had failed after they had achieved 3.5% participation during a peak event,” says Chenoweth.

At this tender juncture in our country’s trajectory, the fundraiser’s role is not simply about raising funds—it never was. It’s about addressing and solving the social problems that define your nonprofit’s mission.

How can the 3.5% rule be replicated in your fundraising work and community?

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »