Beyond Major Gifts: Transformational Donors

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA

To quickly understand the difference between a major donor and a transformational donor, here are three examples of very different donors, all of whom at one time were LAPA clients: first, a mega wealthy donor; second, a thoughtful philanthropist who made good use of his family fortune; and third, a widow who leveraged her own gift and invited her family and friends to join her.

  • Michael Bloomberg gave a historic $1.8 billion gift to Johns Hopkins University (JHU) entirely for financial aid, allowing JHU to begin accepting students without regard to their ability to pay. His total giving to the university has now reached more than $3.5 billion.
  • The late philanthropist Henry van Ameringen gave $100,000 to Harlem United to spend in any way it felt would be most useful. A regular annual donor to Harlem United at the $45,000 level, his unrestricted support allowed the agency to improve its evaluation and impact measurements program, a move that attracted many new funders who were drawn to documented performance.
  • June Wink, a regular annual donor to the Fellowship of Reconciliation at the $2,000 level, sought to honor her late husband, the scholar Walter Wink, and turned to her family and friends to join her. Through this, she created a special $250,000 scholarship fund for the nonprofit. Using this scholarship fund, a unique internship for seminary students was formed to carry on Walter’s legacy, including his vision of Jesus’s “third way” of peace and nonviolent resistance.

Despite the wide range of gift amounts among these donors, all three show that the transformational donor is interested in impact, or in “moving the needle,” as the saying goes.

All three were already major donors to their respective nonprofits, but through careful cultivation by the nonprofits’ fundraisers, their giving became transformational.

Yes, they gave significantly more revenue, but that wasn’t the driver of their increased levels of giving. Instead, the impetus was rooted solidly in a transformational idea — an idea rooted in advancing the nonprofit’s mission at the highest level.

Big Hairy Audacious GoalsBHAGs

We call the development of these big ideas Big Hairy Audacious Goals (BHAGs), a concept developed by management guru Jim Collins.

The integration of institutional strategic planning and philanthropy is also demonstrated in these examples. Your nonprofit must know which of its big ideas take priority and how much revenue is needed to really accomplish those large goals.

While it’s true that each donor in these examples had “the capacity to give,” as any prospect researcher would observe, capacity wasn’t enough. To truly capture the largest giving, the nonprofit needed to have a transformational impact to offer.

I describe this reality in my book Fundraising 401 in Chapter 8, “Big Ideas Attract Big Money.” In it, I quote a study that revealed that 73.5% of wealthy donors contribute expressly to have an impact on the world around them. When you define and offer donors an opportunity to have a big impact, you’ll likely receive larger contributions.

If you’d like to talk about this blog post and how it applies to your nonprofit, or about how to identify transformational donors, please email Brooke Bryant, and schedule a time to talk.

What’s your experience of identifying and cultivating transformational donors for your nonprofit? Please share with us below.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Site Visits in the Zoom Age

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA & Sheldon Bart  In what we might call the BC era (Before COVID), site visits mainly entailed a tour of your nonprofit’s facility. You took the foundation program officer or the major donor on a walk around the program site to give them a good look at your day-to-day operations. They were happy to see in action the services described in words in your proposal or application. The tour consumed most of the time available for the visit, with a few minutes left over for questions. Now, after the disease disrupted our routines (or AD),

Read More »

Kick Off Your Year-End Fundraising Drive With a Thank You

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA Your year-end drive likely features written and email appeals delivered between Thanksgiving and the end of the year. That’s good … but … Before you make your appeals, you have an important opportunity to say “thank you” — and to do so in a way that is fresh and vibrant. Thanksgiving offers you a perfect hook for kicking off your year-end drive through a Thank-A-Thon — a “Thanks Bonanza” that you can start preparing for now. I cannot emphasize enough the importance of thanking donors and doing so in ways that do not come attached

Read More »

Giving Tuesday vs. Donor Advised Funds

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA As Giving Tuesday comes around on November 30, I am asking you to think deeply before you commit to promoting it. My annual struggle over whether to include Giving Tuesday (GT) in my year-end fundraising plan is in full swing. This year, I am distracted by the gargantuan untapped revenue that you can access from those donors with Donor Advised Funds (DAFs) — upwards of $140 billion. I am asking myself if instead of focusing on Giving Tuesday, would it be more lucrative for me to focus on cultivating and soliciting those donors with Donor Advised Funds? Your

Read More »

Gift Charts Are Fundamental

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA The adage “If you fail to plan, you plan to fail” applies to gift charts. A gift chart shows giving levels from low to high and informs fundraisers on how many donors they need at each level of giving to reach the fundraising goal. As such, gift charts are central to careful development planning. They are also useful for all sizes of nonprofits — not just large campaigns or large organizations. Taking a short amount of time to make, a gift chart will deepen your ability to manage your time and staff resources to focus

Read More »