How to Win a Government Grant

By Laurence A. Pagnoni, MPA, and Perry W. Kaplan

Federal and state agencies provide significant support to nonprofits each year through government grants.

But the process for applying for government grants is far from easy.

In fact, it’s quite complicated.

Competition for government support is intense — and the application process is fraught with complexity.

Winning a government grant requires nonprofits to carefully align the main pieces of their grant proposals.

Here are seven tips for effectively competing for — and winning — a government grant.

Match the Funder’s Priorities

More than ever, getting funded requires that you propose projects that address all the funder’s priorities or goals for each request for proposals (RFP).

You are significantly less likely to win funding by shoe-horning your project into an RFP.

It’s also a waste of your time and resources.

Align Your Proposal With the Scoring System

You should write your proposal with a keen eye for how it will score.

A few points can make the difference between securing an award and coming up empty.

Just 10 years ago, a score of 80-82 (out of 100) was often enough to secure funding.

Today, because of increased competition, it is rare that a proposal gets funded if it scores below a 92 or 93.

Every point counts. As a result, it’s important to  do everything you can to avoid leaving points on the table.

Balance Evidence With Innovation

The most fundable proposals balance evidence-based practices (EBP) and innovation. You can show you are paying attention to and using what works by incorporating EBPs in your proposal.

But don’t throw EBPs in indiscriminately. Proposals with inadequately justified EBPs will be scored down. Fundable proposals now serve as “proof of concept,” which requires something different or original.

When you read your proposal, if there is nothing about it that makes it more effective, more efficient, or more appropriate than the status quo — or if it is a collection of barely related EBPs — reconsider your approach.

Prioritize Partnerships

Federal funders typically favor proposals that include partnerships to avoid service duplication — so it’s important to document and list linkages that show you understand the meaning of a continuum of care.

Save your memoranda of understanding for the partnerships that drive your proposal, demonstrate alignment with the funder’s goals/objectives, and clearly state how you will work together.

We recommend highlighting partnerships with organizations that you have worked with for at least two years.

Use the Funder’s Language

Every federal and state agency has its own language. It’s important to make sure your application is written in the funder’s lingo.

If your agency provides clinical mental health services and you are responding to an RFP for integrated health/behavioral health services, your use of language should demonstrate your understanding of the issues involved in primary care and substance use disorder treatment.

Keep It Simple

Simplify the evaluation section of your proposal to respond only to the funder’s requirements.

Some evaluators want to show off — to demonstrate their mastery of statistics or complicated evaluation instruments, for example, by devising an evaluation section that requires a Ph.D. in statistics to understand.

Keep your proposal simple and attend to the funder’s requirements.

Work With Experienced Grant Writers

Producing a winning grant application is an art form. Experienced grant writers who know the nuances of the process are rare and valuable.

Many nonprofits choose grant writers based on price. But you will achieve better results by choosing a grant writer who has a high success rate.

After all, if you pay a grant writer $5,000 for a proposal, but do not win an award, and a competitor pays $10,000 and secures the award, who made the better choice?

Experience is important, but success even more so. Ask grant writers for a list of their applications that have been funded before deciding whom to hire.

You can see LAPA’s Report Card showing our clients’ return on investment by clicking here.

Also, in-house staff often cannot compete with a full-time grant writer who studies the funder every day, attends the funder’s webinars, and in many cases, has even been trained by the funder as a reviewer!

Has your nonprofit had success with applying for government grants? Please share your experience by posting a comment below.

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »
Fundraiser Retention

How To Improve Fundraiser Retention

That disturbingly high turnover rates and low morale plague fundraising professionals is nothing new. Research going back almost two decades shows this to be true.

One study in particular found that the “average fundraiser stays on a job only 16 months.”

In fact, just last year, author Rob Webb called on us to act on fundraising turnover right here in NonProfit Pro.

The past research on turnover was best summarized by our colleague Penelope Burke as follows:

Read More »

The Secret to Why Donors Give

There are many reasons we in the fundraising industry tell one another about why donors give.  They are moved by your mission, they know a board or staff member, they’ve given for years, to name a few.  I doubt that all of them are true, and I especially doubt that they are all true at the same point in the giving calculus for each donor.

Read More »