Translating the Language of Donor Research to Raise More Revenue

By Heather Hill

No matter where you are in the world, as a fundraiser, there’s one challenge you’re probably facing:

How do you find new donors? 

Who are they?  Where are they?  How do you connect with them?  What would inspire them to make a gift to your organization?

Your efforts to acquire new donors must include the multiple new prospect research tools and technologies that include relationship mapping aimed at making it easier for you to secure a donor meeting, and/or competitive analysis of similar organizations to discover new donors who are already funding comparable causes to yours.

These tools can help you deepen your strategies for how to reach new audiences, as well as how best to partner with trustees and board members and provide you pathways to grow major gifts.

When it comes to finding new major donors, in addition to acquiring new prospects, some of your best major gift prospects may already be in your database.  Have you taken a look at your current donors’ data?  Are you unsure how?

Donor data doesn’t have to mean complex predictive analytics or algorithms.  Instead it’s important to start with good data hygiene and ensure that the basic information about your donors and their giving is stellar.

For example …

  • Do you know your average gift size?
  • Do you know when your donors are lapsing or growing in their giving?
  • Do you know what your best performing fundraising activity is?
  • Do you track donor interests?

Understanding these datapoints is important for assessing your fundraising program and developing or revising your fundraising strategy.  Simply knowing the total amount of gifts received does not give you a full picture of your fundraising health.

These datapoints are simple to pull and, in many cases, your database has a function that will do it for you.  The caveat, however, is that you have to track and record the information in order to analyze it.  If you don’t already have a system in place, there’s no better time than the present to establish one. Maybe that is a good enough reason for to set a time for a call with me?

If you feel like these tools are a new language, we empathize!

Data doesn’t have to be a foreign language for us.  We’d like to be your translator who can help you understand what your data is saying, or even go far beyond that to help you find new donors and funders for your crucial mission.

May we set a time for call?

We welcome your comments about this post on the LAPA blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

Has Donor Trust in Charities Changed?

In this age of “fake news”, “alternative facts” “hyper partisanship” and what seems to be a general erosion of trust, why should we even care?  And if we care what can we fundraisers do about it?

Of course, every fundraiser should care because trust is the lynchpin of a solid and sustainable relationship with a donor.  And because there are ways to measure trust, taking steps to increase the level of trust, and by doing so increase donor value and an organization’s net revenue.

Read More »

MacKenzie Strikes Again

You probably won’t recognize most of the names on the list of the top 50 mega-philanthropists.

MacKenzie Scott’s name, though, immediately rings a bell and puts a smile on the face of those of us serving in the non-profit sector.

Ironically, she is not on that list, unlike her ex-husband.

Yet we love her for the special sensitivity she shows us, and her latest “strike,” an announcement to give away $250 million in funding to small nonprofits, is no exception.

Read More »

The CEO as Chief Fundraiser: A Role That Should Never Be Delegated

Our recent posts have lasered in on fundraising perennials–retention of fundraising staff, annual funds, and why donors give.  Another perennial stacks up as equally worthy of thoughtful commentary, and that’s the role of the chief executive officer in fundraising.  

A short definition of a CEO is he or she who makes decisions.  Nowadays, we recognize the value of consensus decision-making, and that’s fine.  But the kinds of decisions I’m referring to are the big ones, decisions such as those made by the captain of a ship.

Read More »